Putting aside the issue of Obama's Constitutional legality to be President which must be handled by the courts, the Reverend presents a fascinating theological argument but in my humble opinion it fails.
Why does it fail? The key here is he uses the Book of Daniel and the claim Obama is the anti-Christ. The Book of Daniel and the story of Joseph form the standard blueprints of how the Righteous in God should stand in the presence of andserve their pagan king. In order for the Reverend to convince some portion of that vast network of loosely federated Christian cells committed to spiritual warfare to switch flags he has to convince them that Obama is not merely pagan but the actual anti-Christ himself! This is a tall order because way many Christians painfully remember past so-called anti-Christs will have to be given very strong evidence this time. In fact the new strategies and tactics being developed and used in modern spiritual warfare will function even if the President is the anti-Christ.
____________________ Pecca fortiter, sed fortius fide et gaude in Christo!
Galactic Signature: Blue Self-Existing Monkey
I think that Obama attracts that anti-Christ thing because he believes every piece of merde about internationalism, the wrongs of the US and how we are in essence the reason evil exists in the world.
I think that prophecy picks up well on archetypal situations and so it is easy to refer to some scripture or Nostradomus quote and go with it.
So, for me, his personal outlook has some validity as an anti-Christ doesn't really have to be a real son of the Devil, but one whose spirit is the "as if" of it.
Here, Obama, friend of major devils, is in real trouble. He is too goddamn comfortable around these people, and for a reason. He is their extension into the world.
____________________ "The force and degree of a man's inner benevolence evokes in others a proportionate degree of ill-will" - Gurdjieff
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell
