The Grove Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
The Grove > The Grove > Jihad and the West > Banned Cartoon About Muslims


Banned Cartoon About Muslims
 Moderated by: Roy  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
Roy
Quasi-Infallible Egocentric Tyrant


Joined: Mon Apr 4th, 2005
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 4326
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Mon Sep 3rd, 2007 03:21 am

Quote

Reply
More important than just that this got censored, are the idiot letters written about it.
I mean no one gets irony. No one gets that the real issue here is not the content of the strip, which is run-of-the-mill cartoon stuff of a political nature, but that the strip got censored by the Washington Post!

Where are their Freedom of Speech cajones!!??

Reading the letters written to Salon.com about it, you would think that the issues here was American sexism, American ovverreaching, the nature of freedom and a lot of things that might just have been relevant if the cartoon hadn't been censored, God Dam It!

Right now, the fucking issue is CENSORFUCKINGSHIP, and little else.

Check the letters here at letters to Salon about this cartoon



____________________
"The force and degree of a man's inner benevolence evokes in others a proportionate degree of ill-will" - Gurdjieff

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell
*Phil*
Opinionated Interventionist


Joined: Thu Apr 21st, 2005
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 3594
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Tue Sep 4th, 2007 04:39 pm

Quote

Reply
This makes me wonder what else is being edited out of the Washington Post.   Is this just the visible tip of the iceberg?



____________________
Pecca fortiter, sed fortius fide et gaude in Christo!
Galactic Signature: Blue Self-Existing Monkey
Roy
Quasi-Infallible Egocentric Tyrant


Joined: Mon Apr 4th, 2005
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 4326
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Wed Sep 5th, 2007 04:10 pm

Quote

Reply
Yes, exactly. Especially since that cartoon wasn't offensive at all, just a decent and realistic assessment of human nature.



____________________
"The force and degree of a man's inner benevolence evokes in others a proportionate degree of ill-will" - Gurdjieff

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell
Propagangster
Honored Fellow Grover
 

Joined: Tue Aug 21st, 2007
Location: Montreal, Quebec Canada
Posts: 20
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Sat Sep 8th, 2007 04:31 pm

Quote

Reply
Censorship? No... Censorshit.

Even if the cartoon was, in fact, offensive or provocative, so what? It's both a risk that free speech is meant to allow, to say unpopular things which may offend, and beyond this, with humour, often, it becomes possible to address very delicate issues with the sort of candor, and interestingly enough, honesty other formats may not readily allow.

My problem with censorshit is this: It very much is a deterent to discussion and dialogue. It aims to remove "All that can be defined as overly objectionable" but in trying to establish what that is, it also makes it impossibly hard to have a sincere and open discussion regarding people's sensibilities and vulnerabilities. We also gain no understanding from those who would find the work objectionable as to why they perceive it as such. And if it takes something "objectionable" to stimulate dialogue, I tend to fail to see the downside down the road, too.

Plus... does anyone know why the Post annexed this cartoon? What the official reason is? I don't even see anything mildly offensive in there.



____________________
"We should be concerned when one man's morality is another man's mortality."
Roy
Quasi-Infallible Egocentric Tyrant


Joined: Mon Apr 4th, 2005
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 4326
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Sat Sep 8th, 2007 05:19 pm

Quote

Reply
Mr. P, the answer to your question about why the Washington Post censored this rather innocuous cartoon would be the difference between you and a modern liberal.

The modern liberal, as opposed to the true liberal or true libertarian, doesn't really value liberty as the strife involved upsets him too much.

In Jungian psychology we say that this man is "anima-possessed". We mean that the person is possessed by an override to certain moods or feelings that can never be allowed to manifest, the way, for example, a mother controls a bunch of kids at a party and doesn't allow certain kinds of things to be said.

Of course, for a party, that would be ok. But, for the greater world such a compulsive application and enforcement of a form of what is essentially etiquette, is disgusting.

You feel it, Mr P, because you are whole. "They", the modern libs, don't feel threatened by the loss of the liberty to express themselves, but rather they feel better by being able to dampen rising emotions and feelings that would cancel out their compulsive, smother-mother imposition of "peace".

The "Christ" of the situation would be the person put on the cross to satisfy the need of a group to punish the person whose attitude unmasked the sell-out by the group to a knee-jerk orthodoxy such as modern political correctness.



____________________
"The force and degree of a man's inner benevolence evokes in others a proportionate degree of ill-will" - Gurdjieff

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell
Corvus
Honored Fellow Grover


Joined: Tue Apr 5th, 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 913
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Tue Sep 11th, 2007 01:11 am

Quote

Reply
so we are willing to risk another 911 again . . . for freedom . . .

I am . . .

:?


Last edited on Tue Sep 11th, 2007 01:11 am by Corvus



____________________
"In a person (not Corvus) who is open to experience each stimulus is freely relayed through the nervous system, without being distorted by any process of defensiveness." -C. Rogers
Roy
Quasi-Infallible Egocentric Tyrant


Joined: Mon Apr 4th, 2005
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 4326
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Tue Sep 11th, 2007 01:41 am

Quote

Reply
Yes, Corvus, we are not going to submit. You have understood well that suffocation to avoid 9/11 is not on the table.

To avoid 9/11, we kill the people who would do it. We have more than the right. We have the obligation.

Hey, and very good about that "I am"!!



____________________
"The force and degree of a man's inner benevolence evokes in others a proportionate degree of ill-will" - Gurdjieff

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

 Current time is 10:46 am




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.2781 seconds (68% database + 32% PHP). 18 queries executed.
Men's
Men's Ring - Dealing with Men's Issues by mrindianajonesprm
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]