 |
| Author | Post |
|---|
Corvus
Honored Fellow Grover
| Joined: | Tue Apr 5th, 2005 |
| Location: | Wisconsin USA |
| Posts: | 913 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11th, 2005 10:22 am |
|
Well, see there in lies the problem with this mode of, uhmm . . . communication . . .
I try and take everything in . . . it paints the most accurate picture of a person . . .
People get set off by little bits and pieces of dialog . . .
I have a big picture of Roy painted, it's hanging next to me as we speak . . .
____________________
"In a person (not Corvus) who is open to experience each stimulus is freely relayed through the nervous system, without being distorted by any process of defensiveness." -C. Rogers
|
Johnny
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11th, 2005 03:06 pm |
|
Corvus wrote: Johnny . . . Jesus is dead.
O.K., if you say so Corvus...
|
BowOfTime
Honored Fellow Grover
| Joined: | Wed Apr 6th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 123 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11th, 2005 08:40 pm |
|
Corvus stated:
BOT . . . I don't give a flaming shit about your problems on another forum.
Sorry if commenting on the ban irks your Corvus. Since Psycho mentioned a reason for being banned, I took the opportunity to clarify the situation. My other interest was to document it publicly - incase it has some future value (I'm not yet aware of); thus as well, making access to it more easy on the net. As Roy has referred to using the expression abstract purpose, I often find that by following such abstractly motivated patterns, they frequently open up future potentialities serving to substantiate a mystic intent. I have no idea if there's that type of future here, but I assure you my focus was not directed in an effort to gain your sympathy.
As for saying you don't give a flaming shit, I think you do. Either that, or your customary nature is to contradict yourself.
Previously you stated:
My father who is a guidance consoler at the local middle school suggests boys have no outlet for any sort of aggressive play . . . even in sports aggression is not tolerated. Recently a child threw a popsicle stick at another child and was suspended for the rest of that day and his parents had to come into school for a conference.
Any aggression displayed is immediately considered violent and schools black list these children . . . "Zero Tolerance" is going to make for a fine bunch of robots.
Where is this energy going to manifest itself in the future . . . ?
Unless I'm misreading this, it sounds to me like you care. The problem we face isn't in a single forum. It's an epidemic that's become prevalent throughout our culture; localized most destructively among those of authority, and most tragically, when they're in charge of teaching young children (frequently those among us who feel most inferior, possess the greatest vigor to seek positions of authority - often then being our problems source). Just think about the mentality in a specific type of person who would suspend or blacklist a young boy for throwing a Popsicle stick. Now consider the reason I was banned. It was for repeatedly exposing this very type of absurd authoritative behavior, in exactly the same type of people. So exact, that the person who gave me the most cause to respond (he who primarily promoted my ban) is, believe it or not, an elementary school teacher - with a ranking authority in that system. Thus, if his actions as a forum moderator are an indicator, I suspect he would gleefully support the blacklisting of all Popsicle slingers. You know what scares a person like this the most Corvus, it's people like Roy who understand their neurosis, and isn't afraid to tell them. Which - in my opinion - is a primary reason Roy got banned. Therefore, as it thus becomes clear, if you truly don't give a "flaming shit", then it's likely your a flaming fool. And I find that regrettable, because you seem to possess an authentic range of potential.
The confusion here regarding your response, reminds me of a particular mentality that can be found in many younger men these days. Those who indiscriminately lash out, because their unable to clearly identify the causal factors for their annoyance - much like a wild animal locked in a cage. The problem these animals face however, is that while confined and unable to escape, they begin to indiscriminately attack the hands which come near enough to feed and assist them (some of these hands emerge in the interest of eventually setting them free; rather than those who want to keep the animal healthy and trapped). Therefore, once every helpful hand is been bitten off, everyone else will avoid the confined beast; which is left trapped, and will resultantly starve to death (sadly these young men can frequently grow up to be suicides, or more tragically, immortalized on the evening news after shooting all their ex-coworkers). You see Corvus, in some traditional societies they used to have a solution for this. When the young idiot would start becoming unruly, then the mens group would step in, kick the living shit out of him (with an array of different measures dependent upon the culture), and thus terrorize the fool so extremely, that in turn he respects them for the deed. It's such a shame that today we've lost this source of entertainment. If we still had it, my first target would be Mick Jagger.
BowOfTime
|
Current time is 10:52 pm | Page:   1 2 |
|
|
|
|
